Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Luxury Watch comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe
Our previous luxury watch comparison article pitched the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Dual Time against the Vacheron Constantin Overseas Dual Time, a fight which Vacheron Constantin mysteriously and undisputedly won. Our next fight sees Audemars Piguet enter the ring once more, this time against one of the world’s most prominent watchmaking ateliers, Patek Philippe. In this luxury watch comparison, we pitch Audemars Piguet’s Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar Ref. 26574 against Patek Philippe’s fresh out of the plastic new Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740.
 
Toe to toe, no holds barred, who will win? We should investigate!
 

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

We will take after a comparative structure as our debut Battle Royale article. The initial segment of this inside and out examination will center around contrasting the feel of the two pieces, with the second part taking a gander at the systems controlling them. The last part we will expect to condense our discoveries and convey our decision. Along these lines, all things considered, we should start. We should begin with the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar Ref. 26574. It’s accessible in a group of dial and case metal varieties, yet the one we will center around is the tempered steel variation with that flawless blue dial.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

This is a dial that packs a considerable measure of data. Taking a gander at it from a clockwise bearing and beginning at 12 o’clock, you obviously have your exchanging month pointer (January, March, May, and so on), with a jump year marker implanted inside that sub-dial enlist. Moving to 3 o’clock and now you have the date marker, and at 6 o’clock you have the ravishing moonphase. Presently, in case you’re anything like me (and I’ve specified this a million and one times), at that point you get a kick out of the chance to see development on a dial. It’s cool to watch a smooth seconds’ hand doing its thing, and the moonphase sub-dial would have been the ideal place for Audemars Piguet to have put it.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Anyway, moving around the dial again and this time at 9 o’clock we have the passing days, all indicated by the first three letters of their respective names. In the centre of the dial we have the baton-shaped and lume-filled hour and minute hands, and what looks to be a sweeping-seconds hand is actually the week indicator, with the outer chapter ring of the dial depicting the week that is. Each sub-dial features circular engraving, and each is colored in a deeper, darker blue. Great differentiation from the rest of the dial.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

The dial itself highlights Audemars Piguet’s trademark “Grande Tapisserie” design, while the external section ring balances the dial’s texturized look by giving an extremely smooth differentiation the opens up the watch superbly well. The dial format is efficient, intentional and well thoroughly considered. The moonphase looks interminably superior to the 5740’s, and in the session of feline and mouse where a potential suitor will no uncertainty think about these pieces next to each other, these little tasteful contrasts will have a significant effect.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

The stainless steel instance of the 26574 sits at an exceptionally wearable 41mm in distance across and 9.5mm in thickness. These sorts of extents may not appear that great, with because of Audemars Piguet’s Royal Oak RD#2 Perpetual Calendar Ultra-Thin’s miniscule measurements, however remember the measure of mechanical innovation sitting all things considered. The octagonal bezel and scandalous Royal Oak arm jewelery highlights ultra-fine vertically brushings, while the rehaut of the bezel down to the case is cleaned and gives an incredible textural differentiate. The 8-hexgonal bezel sinks are all match up, and does well to fulfill my OCD-like propensities. The 26574 interests to me extraordinarily from a tasteful point of view, with my solitary main problem being the lacking development on the dial. Interminable timetable dials are prestigious for being exhausting without having some type of dynamic development, and shockingly the lacking seconds hand is simply something I can’t neglect.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Presently onto the Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740. This was Patek’s response to the regularly developing interest of their Nautilus gathering, in particular the 5711 and the 5712 (of which are currently costing moronically high totals of cash and with a hold up list that will influence your 30-year to contract term appear like a breeze). The Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740 was the enormous cash creator for Patek at the current year’s Baselworld. There’s a considerable measure to be amped up for with the 5740. It’s opened up the Nautilus gathering, and it’s given Patek another hand to play with. Along these lines, how about we investigate.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

The 5740’s dial stocks a great deal of similarities with the 26574’s. A similar sub-dial design, a missing sweeping-seconds hand, and every one the indicators sitting side. At 3 o’clock you’ve got precisely the exact same month and leap year design because the 26574’s. At 6 o’clock you’ve got the somewhat lackluster (and nearly excruciating looking) moonphase, together with the date being portrayed in its surrounding ring. And in 9 o’clock you’ve got a 24-hour index embedded inside the day sub-dial enroll. Why Patek would include a 24-hour index I don’t have any idea. It is more of a filler feature, instead of something well thought out, in my frank opinion. And at the middle of the dial you’ve got the conventional 1 hour and minute handson. Again, no lively motion, no sweeping seconds hand. A dial that falls shorts due to the actuality. Are you currently seeing a trend here?

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Past the endless calendar signs, the dial also offers the Nautilus’ classic flat blue ribbing and implemented hour markers. The outer chapter ring includes a dotted pattern constituting the passing moments, and it appears to be that there’s ample space here to get a super slick sweeping-seconds hand (check out the 5711’s) to have already been inserted. Anyhow, in direct contrast to this 26574’s dial, the 5740’s looks marginally milder, and dare I say it womanly? Its suppler look is not in any way unappealing, and its own aesthetic is one that’s somewhat more elegant, and I am convinced it is one that is going to interest the more mature members of this horological community.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Past the endless calendar signs, the dial also offers the Nautilus’ classic flat blue ribbing and implemented hour markers. The outer chapter ring includes a dotted pattern constituting the passing moments, and it appears to be that there’s ample space here to get a super slick sweeping-seconds hand (check out the 5711’s) to have already been inserted. Anyhow, in direct contrast to this 26574’s dial, the 5740’s looks marginally milder, and dare I say it womanly? Its suppler look is not in any way unappealing, and its own aesthetic is one that’s somewhat more elegant, and I am convinced it is one that is going to interest the more mature members of this horological community.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Thus, to sum up my aesthetic findings of those 2 bits I will definitely state with confidence which I much favor the competitive and masculine expression of this 26574 within the understated, almost delicate expression of this 5740. The 26574 has existence and can readily stick out in a bunch and fly well under the radar in the specific same moment. From a visceral standpoint, Audemars Piguet’s entrance in this Battle Royale wins.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Now on the motion, and I will tell very easily (and you must, too) who’ll win this round. The 26574 is powered with the grade 5134, which is really an upgraded version of this 2120. What some of you might not be aware of is the calibre 2120 relies on Jaeger-LeCoultre’s 920 motion. This is a motion which has been made by JLC but not really utilized in any of the pieces. It had been created only as a foundation ébauche motion for the likes of Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin and naturally, Audemars Piguet. The ébauche motion is wound and just depicts the passage hours and moments, therefore Audemars Piguet’s calibres 2120 and 5134 are heavily modified versions of this 920.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

The calibre 5134 is 29mm in diameter and also 4.31millimeters in thickness. It is composed of 374-parts, includes an energy reserve of 40-hours and comprises the passage hours and moments, in addition to the conventional perpetual calendar functions such as the afternoon, the date, the leap year, the month and weekly. There’s also an astronomical attribute i.e. that the moonphase indicator at 6 o’clock, also. The moonphase is laser micro-structured and placed on top of an aventurine foundation, ergo its own brilliance. Throughout the open sapphire caseback you are capable of seeing that the skeletonised micro-rotor. As for me, I’d have chosen the 15400’s strong gold strand. I naturally realise this could have made the motion slightly thicker, but in the visual standpoint that is a far more interesting and a lot more appealing rotor. In the conclusion of the afternoon, but this can be a modified ébauche motion, albeit rather a great one. I can not fathom spending thousands of dollars on a watch whose motion is less than in house, therefore for me it is sort of a deal breaker.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

The 5740 is powered by Patek Philippe’s Caliber 240 Q, a well renowned calibre which Patek really uses in a couple of the other, more dressy timepieces. These contain the Patek 5140 Perpetual Calendar, the 5940 Perpetual Calendar along with also the Patek 5327. The 240 Q is an automated micro-rotor calibre that’s made in house by Patek Philippe and comprises the passage hours and moments, in addition to the inventory regular functions of a perpetual calendar i.e. day and date indicator, in addition to a leap year index. Additionally, it comprises a 24-hour indicator along with a moonphase. The moonphase appears quite lack-lustre and nearly rushed, as if Patek did not have sufficient time to tend to it suitably. The 24-hour index (which also fronts as a day/night index ) is a moot improvement and one which really does not have to be there. In reality, each one the bits powered with the Calibre 240 Q possess this ridiculous accession.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

But, the motion in its entirety is significantly better than the grade 5134 powering the 26574. The motion sits in 27.5millimeters in diameter and also 3.88millimeters in thickness, has a power reserve of around 48-hours and can be powered with a 22k gold micro-rotor. This is a motion that’s superlatively a far more beautiful calibre compared to 5134. The off-centered micro-rotor is a fitting inclusion and one which does not obscure the motion. It sports a variety of finishing techniques we have become accustomed to seeing from Patek, and all in all it is a lot more appealing looking motion. I totally adore the fact that we have obtained an in-house calibre powering the 5740, so for this reality (and believing this is, on a whole, a better mechanism than the 5134) I will hand it into the Patek with this around.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Thus, what exactly does this mean to our Battle Royale conclusion? Well, it is a challenging choice, therefore I’m likely to throw a different in the combination. You have also got the magnificent Vacheron Constantin Overseas Ultra-Thin Perpetual Calendar. In-house motion, great proportions, functional and wearable. Perhaps we ought to have contained it, also? Anyhow, let us sum up our findings. From an aesthetic standpoint, the Royal Oak takes the cake. The 26574’s bundle, in its entirety, is a much better looking watch. The”Grande Tapisserie” dial is much more intriguing, the sub-dial design is cleaner, so the moonphase is much more appealing, the circumstance is somewhat a stimulating affair, and it presents itself as a wearable timepiece. The 5740’s motion is more amazing, more fascinating, attributes more finishing strategies and, needless to say, it is made in-house. A real plus for me personally.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Both bits do, nevertheless, have their pit-falls. The lacking active motion on the dials leave them slightly stagnant, boring even, together with the speediest of these indicators being the second hand. I enjoy seeing motion on a dialup, and as amazing because equally dials are, I can not get over the fact that we do not have some of the drama or theatrics. My only other qualm is that the simple fact that Audemars Piguet is not employing an in-house motion, despite controlling such a high cost. It gets under my skin once a producer as big as outdated as Audemars Piguet chooses the”easy” path and utilizes an ébauche motion, no matter our greatly altered it’s. I really don’t care. Ebauche is ébauche, whichever way you look at it. I might be barking up the wrong tree and stepping on some toes, but I know I am not the only one to feel like that. Step your game up, men.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

$60,7000USD (roughly $80,000AUD), whereas the Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740 prices 105,000CHF (roughly $140,000AUD). A massive gap, but remember that the 5740 is constructed from white gold, although the 26574 is made from stainless steel, and also the 5740 does comprise an in-house created calibre. Oh, also Patek has only increased the cost of the bits by 20%. Keep this in the back of your thoughts prior to making your own choice.

Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Alright, enough rambling on. My choice was made. I have consulted with the group, gone back and forth a thousand and one times, requested the horological gods for advice and have develop my definitive response. Between the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar Ref. 26574 along with the Patek Philippe Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740, I announce the winner to function as 26574! Movement apart (and trust me this wasn’t a simple problem to sweep under the carpet ), the Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar presents itself as a much better view along the wide spectrum of what creates a watch easier compared to another. Visually, it is a more intriguing bundle. It’s sufficient wrist existence to create a statement but remains quite inconspicuous. Dress it up or down, it does not actually matter the 26574 is still a wonderful timepiece, well worthy of its own undisputed place because this Battle Royale’s victorious winner.
Summary
Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe
Article Name
Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe
Description
In this luxury watch comparison, we pitch Audemars Piguet's Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar Ref. 26574 against Patek Philippe's fresh out of the plastic new Nautilus Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5740.
Publisher Name
Collector Watches

1 thought on “Luxury Watch Comparison: Audemars Piguet vs. Patek Philippe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

shares